Survey report
 Site
 
 Standard 360
 Atlas standard 360 survey
 
 2012/05/21

Survey report
CompanySite
SurveyStandard 360
Atlas standard 360 survey
Individual reports10
Date2012/05/21

Table of contents

Parameter overview

Survey totals

A summary of parameters

Benchmark comparison

Survey totals

Key figures compared to previous surveys based on the same questions.


Benchmark example 1

Benchmark example 2

Standard 360
Stress management3.93.93.9
Communication4.04.04.3
Decision-making3.93.84.1
Leadership3.73.83.9
Social and networking3.83.93.8
Teamwork4.03.94.0
 
Number of subjects101010
Number of respondents505050
Completed questionnaires505050

Parameters by role

Shows each parameter broken down by respondent role

Stress management

  • xx prioritizes assigned tasks under stress
  • xx maintains a positive outlook at work
  • xx reacts constructively to criticism
  • xx uses his/her emotions constructively in difficult situations
  • xx works productively in stressful environments
  • xx maintains his/her focus in stressed situations
  • xx is good at spotting new opportunities

Survey totals

Definition
Can work constructively and fluidly in stressful or unpredictable situations without losing focus or direction.

Interpretation
A high score usually indicates that the leader is capable of leading his/her employees through crises without stressing them unnecessarily.

B
Very good
Score: 3.9
Spread: 0.3Gap to self: 0.3
Low - Your respondents agree on thisLow - Your estimation is close to your respondents'

Communication

  • xx compromises when necessary
  • xx expresses respect for the opinions and views of others
  • xx brings clarity to communication when something is unclear
  • xx makes presentations with confidence and gets his/her message across clearly
  • xx expresses his/her opinions clearly
  • xx listens to others to gain understanding
  • xx clearly expresses his/her requirements and expectations of me
  • xx is open and honest in his/her communication

Survey totals

Definition
Promotes dialog and understanding through communication.

Interpretation
A high score usually indicates that the leader encourages an open and safe work environment where knowledge-sharing and synergy thrive.

A-
Excellent
Score: 4.3
Spread: 0.3Gap to self: 0.3
Low - Your respondents agree on thisLow - Your estimation is close to your respondents'

Decision-making

  • xx allocates resources optimally
  • xx is willing to modify his/her own decisions when appropriate
  • xx respects the decisions of others
  • xx considers alternative options
  • xx makes necessary decisions, even if they are unpopular
  • xx consults with relevant parties before making major decisions
  • xx clearly communicates his/her decisions to relevant parties
  • xx ensures that decisions are being executed

Survey totals

Definition
Ability to make clear decisions based on a solid foundation and implement these decisions.

Interpretation
A high score usually indicates that employees rarely find themselves unsure about what is expected of them, and thus find it easier to perform their tasks.

B+
Very good
Score: 4.1
Spread: 0.1Gap to self: 0.5
Low - Your respondents agree on thisLow - Your estimation is close to your respondents'

Leadership

  • xx provides me with opportunities for growth and development
  • xx motivates me if I have an uninteresting task
  • xx provides me with tasks suitable to my professional level and experience
  • xx tells me if the quality of my work is unsatisfactory
  • xx continuously ensures that I know my goals
  • xx delegates tasks to the appropriate resources
  • xx allocates resources optimally
  • xx provides me with tasks, I find challenging
  • xx creates a motivating environment for goal-achievement
  • xx recruits talented employees
  • xx expresses his/her recognition when I do my work well

Survey totals

Definition
Can guide, distribute work, and offer employees the opportunity to perform optimally.

Interpretation
A high score usually leads to enterprising, independent and high-performing employees.

B
Very good
Score: 3.9
Spread: 0.2Gap to self: 0.0
Low - Your respondents agree on thisLow - Your estimation is close to your respondents'

Social and networking

  • xx asks for help when it is needed
  • xx gets along well with most people
  • xx respects and maintains deadlines, and other agreements
  • xx is able to negotiate acceptable solutions for all parties involved
  • xx openly and honestly offers knowledge and skills to help others
  • xx relates well to all people, regardless of their position within the organization
  • xx promotes new ways of collaboration through his/her network
  • xx actively seeks new contacts
  • xx introduces people to one another
  • xx establishes useful networks within the organization
  • xx is credible

Survey totals

Definition
Can obtain support/collaborative companionship through binding relationships and networks.

Interpretation
A high score indicates that the manager can easily create essential conditions to ensure flow and quality in work execution.

B-
Very good
Score: 3.8
Spread: 0.2Gap to self: 0.2
Low - Your respondents agree on thisLow - Your estimation is close to your respondents'

Teamwork

  • xx gets along well with most people
  • xx engages me in dialogue
  • xx is helpful
  • xx promotes new ways of collaboration through his/her network
  • xx supports others on the team
  • xx is credible
  • xx respects and maintains deadlines, and other agreements
  • xx listens to others to gain understanding
  • xx expresses respect for the opinions and views of others
  • xx understands and respects the role of other players on the team
  • xx knows and respects his/her role in team-based situations
  • xx brings valuable knowledge and skills to the team

Survey totals

Definition
Can motivate employees/ team to achieve synergy through collaboration.

Interpretation
A high score usually indicates that the leader is able to create a stimulating work environment for high-performing employees.

B+
Very good
Score: 4.0
Spread: 0.1Gap to self: 0.2
Low - Your respondents agree on thisLow - Your estimation is close to your respondents'

Subject comparison

Shows subject scores side-by-side, giving a comparison of different staff member skills.

Click the column headers to sort the table

Subject comparison (1/2)

SubjectAverageStress managementCommunicationDecision-making
Bryan Andersen4.44.64.94.8
Adrienne Whitcomb4.24.34.24.1
Ida Roeder4.13.34.84.5
Gregory Nilsen4.13.94.24.0
Laura Cruz4.13.84.34.3
Laura Boatwright4.14.04.74.1
Survey average4.03.94.34.1
Adrienne Andersen3.93.34.84.0
Gregory Boatwright3.84.33.54.0
Bryan Eshelman3.84.33.54.0
Danielle Lerma3.73.54.03.3

Subject comparison (2/2)

SubjectAverageLeadershipSocial and networkingTeamwork
Bryan Andersen4.44.73.43.8
Adrienne Whitcomb4.24.34.34.2
Ida Roeder4.14.13.44.3
Gregory Nilsen4.14.04.24.2
Laura Cruz4.13.74.24.2
Laura Boatwright4.13.93.54.1
Survey average4.03.93.84.0
Adrienne Andersen3.93.63.44.0
Gregory Boatwright3.83.53.64.0
Bryan Eshelman3.83.93.43.8
Danielle Lerma3.73.44.23.8

Open-response questions

Survey totals

Text-based answers to open questions. The answers have been given with a promise of anonymity and it is not possible to see who have given the answer.

Areas of strength (23)

#SubjectRespondentComments
1Danielle LermaSubordinateLorem ipsum dolor sit amet.
2Ida RoederSelfDuis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit... Ut enim ad minim veniam.
3Gregory NilsenCustomerDuis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit...
4Gregory NilsenSupplierUt enim ad minim veniam.
5Adrienne AndersenSelfExcepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident. Ut enim ad minim veniam.
6Adrienne AndersenCustomerLorem ipsum dolor sit amet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.
7Adrienne AndersenCustomerLorem ipsum dolor sit amet.
8Adrienne AndersenCustomerUt enim ad minim veniam. Ut enim ad minim veniam.
9Laura CruzSubordinateExcepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident. Ut enim ad minim veniam.
10Gregory BoatwrightManagerExcepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit...
11Bryan AndersenSelfExcepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident.
12Bryan AndersenPeerLorem ipsum dolor sit amet. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit...
13Bryan AndersenCustomerExcepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident. Ut enim ad minim veniam.
14Bryan AndersenCustomerDuis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit...
15Laura BoatwrightSelfDuis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit... Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.
16Laura BoatwrightSupplierExcepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.
17Bryan EshelmanSelfUt enim ad minim veniam. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident.
18Bryan EshelmanManagerUt enim ad minim veniam.
19Bryan EshelmanSubordinateExcepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident.
20Adrienne WhitcombOtherDuis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit...
21Adrienne WhitcombSupplierLorem ipsum dolor sit amet. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit...
22Adrienne WhitcombSubordinateExcepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident.
23Adrienne WhitcombSubordinateLorem ipsum dolor sit amet. Ut enim ad minim veniam.

Areas of improvement (18)

#SubjectRespondentComments
1Danielle LermaSelfUt enim ad minim veniam.
2Danielle LermaManagerUt enim ad minim veniam. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.
3Ida RoederOtherExcepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident.
4Gregory NilsenSelfDuis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit...
5Adrienne AndersenSelfExcepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.
6Adrienne AndersenCustomerDuis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit...
7Adrienne AndersenCustomerUt enim ad minim veniam.
8Laura CruzSupplierExcepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident.
9Laura CruzCustomerExcepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.
10Gregory BoatwrightManagerDuis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit...
11Gregory BoatwrightOtherExcepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident.
12Bryan AndersenPeerLorem ipsum dolor sit amet.
13Bryan AndersenSupplierUt enim ad minim veniam.
14Laura BoatwrightSelfDuis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit... Ut enim ad minim veniam.
15Laura BoatwrightPeerExcepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident. Ut enim ad minim veniam.
16Bryan EshelmanManagerExcepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident.
17Bryan EshelmanManagerExcepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident.
18Adrienne WhitcombSupplierLorem ipsum dolor sit amet.

Question breakdown

Shows all numeric questions.

Breakdown by question (Agree 1-5)

5-point classic Likert scale

Survey totals

Click the column headers to sort the table

#QuestionSelfManagerPeerSubordinateCustomerSupplierOtherAll
4xx motivates me if I have an uninteresting task3.83.54.33.44.44.03.43.8
5xx delegates tasks to the appropriate resources3.93.84.03.74.24.34.04.0
6xx makes necessary decisions, even if they are unpopular4.04.14.33.94.54.14.04.1
7xx recruits talented employees3.83.43.34.03.94.14.83.9
8xx uses his/her emotions constructively in difficult situations3.94.14.34.03.84.03.63.9
9xx understands and respects the role of other players on the team3.74.83.03.74.43.94.04.0
10xx provides me with tasks, I find challenging4.23.94.33.94.13.73.84.0
11xx makes presentations with confidence and gets his/her message across clearly4.43.44.74.34.84.64.04.3
12xx allocates resources optimally3.94.34.34.04.24.14.44.1
13xx promotes new ways of collaboration through his/her network3.93.93.34.13.64.33.83.9
14xx maintains a positive outlook at work3.34.54.33.44.04.33.43.9
15xx supports others on the team3.84.63.73.74.23.94.04.0
16xx expresses his/her opinions clearly4.14.44.34.34.94.44.04.4
17xx provides me with tasks suitable to my professional level and experience3.93.54.33.93.83.94.03.8
18xx considers alternative options3.44.34.04.04.44.04.04.0
19xx prioritizes assigned tasks under stress3.94.04.33.94.04.43.64.0
20xx reacts constructively to criticism3.54.14.34.13.83.93.63.9
21xx provides me with opportunities for growth and development3.84.04.03.34.34.13.63.9
22xx actively seeks new contacts3.94.03.34.03.63.94.03.8
23xx establishes useful networks within the organization3.73.52.73.73.63.94.03.6
24xx creates a motivating environment for goal-achievement4.03.54.04.14.54.04.44.1
25xx introduces people to one another4.33.63.33.73.64.03.43.8
26xx works productively in stressful environments3.74.34.33.93.84.43.23.9
27xx gets along well with most people4.23.64.73.73.74.64.24.0
28xx knows and respects his/her role in team-based situations3.55.03.34.44.34.44.44.2
29xx relates well to all people, regardless of their position within the organization3.94.14.03.63.33.73.03.7
30xx maintains his/her focus in stressed situations3.74.44.34.03.94.13.44.0
31xx is good at spotting new opportunities3.74.34.03.63.94.34.24.0
32xx expresses respect for the opinions and views of others3.93.55.04.04.84.44.24.2
33xx listens to others to gain understanding4.03.54.34.04.74.64.24.2
34xx is willing to modify his/her own decisions when appropriate3.64.34.04.04.44.44.64.2
35xx respects the decisions of others3.83.84.33.44.54.14.44.0
36xx consults with relevant parties before making major decisions4.04.44.34.04.44.34.04.2
37xx continuously ensures that I know my goals3.93.54.33.73.84.03.83.8
38xx tells me if the quality of my work is unsatisfactory3.93.64.73.74.04.03.63.9
39xx expresses his/her recognition when I do my work well3.43.53.73.13.83.93.63.6
40xx is helpful3.94.84.04.14.13.74.44.1
41xx clearly expresses his/her requirements and expectations of me4.13.64.33.94.64.94.24.2
42xx compromises when necessary4.03.55.04.14.64.64.24.2
43xx brings clarity to communication when something is unclear4.04.15.04.14.84.74.44.4
44xx is open and honest in his/her communication4.04.34.74.34.64.64.44.4
45xx clearly communicates his/her decisions to relevant parties3.23.94.33.94.34.14.43.9
46xx ensures that decisions are being executed3.74.84.34.04.34.34.04.2
47xx openly and honestly offers knowledge and skills to help others3.53.34.04.03.43.93.03.5
48xx asks for help when it is needed3.53.54.03.93.53.93.83.7
49xx is able to negotiate acceptable solutions for all parties involved4.03.53.33.93.14.13.63.7
50xx respects and maintains deadlines, and other agreements4.03.43.74.13.43.73.43.7
51xx is credible4.13.84.33.74.14.03.63.9
52xx brings valuable knowledge and skills to the team3.94.64.04.04.13.64.44.1

ScaleDescriptionValues
Agree 1-5
Continuous
5-point classic Likert scale5.0: Strongly agree
4.0: Agree
3.0: Neither agree nor disagree
2.0: Disagree
1.0: Strongly disagree

Breakdown by question (Male/Female)

Male or Female

Survey totals

Click the column headers to sort the table

#QuestionSelfManagerPeerSubordinateCustomerSupplierOtherAll
1What is your gender?3 Male (30%)
7 Female (70%)
5 Male (63%)
3 Female (38%)
3 Male (100%)7 Male (100%)10 Male (100%)7 Male (100%)5 Male (100%)40 Male (80%)
10 Female (20%)

ScaleDescriptionValues
Male/Female
Discrete
Male or Female100.0: Male
0.0: Female

Breakdown by question (Age groups)

Age groups in steps of 5 years between 15 and 70

Survey totals

Click the column headers to sort the table

#QuestionSelfManagerPeerSubordinateCustomerSupplierOtherAll
2What is your age?31.540.827.029.127.531.331.031.5

ScaleDescriptionValues
Age groups
Continuous
Age groups in steps of 5 years between 15 and 7017.0: 15-19
22.0: 20-24
27.0: 25-29
32.0: 30-34
37.0: 35-39
42.0: 40-44
47.0: 45-49
52.0: 50-55
57.0: 55-59
62.0: 60-64
67.0: 65-70

Breakdown by question (Month groups)

Months in groups ranging from less than 6 months to more than 6 years

Survey totals

Click the column headers to sort the table

#QuestionSelfManagerPeerSubordinateCustomerSupplierOtherAll
3How long have you been employed at your current company?111510989810
53How long have you known xx?12221299121012
54How long have you worked with xx?1619191413121115

ScaleDescriptionValues
Month groups
Continuous
Months in groups ranging from less than 6 months to more than 6 years3: Less than 6 months
9: 6-12 months
18: 1-2 years
36: 2-4 years
60: 4-6 years
84: More than 6 years