Individual report
 Site
 
 
Danielle Lerma
 
 Standard 360
 Atlas standard 360 survey
 
 2012/05/21

Individual report
CompanySite
SurveyStandard 360
Atlas standard 360 survey
Completed questionnaires5
Date2012/05/21

Table of contents

Skill overview

Individual values

A summary of skills

Skills by role

Shows how each respondent role has evaluated the skill

Stress management

  • xx prioritizes assigned tasks under stress
  • xx maintains a positive outlook at work
  • xx reacts constructively to criticism
  • xx uses his/her emotions constructively in difficult situations
  • xx works productively in stressful environments
  • xx maintains his/her focus in stressed situations
  • xx is good at spotting new opportunities

Individual values

Definition
Can work constructively and fluidly in stressful or unpredictable situations without losing focus or direction.

Interpretation
A high score usually indicates that the leader is capable of leading his/her employees through crises without stressing them unnecessarily.

C+
Good
Score: 3.5
Spread: 0.3Gap to self: 0.4
Low - Your respondents agree on thisLow - Your estimation is close to your respondents'

Communication

  • xx compromises when necessary
  • xx expresses respect for the opinions and views of others
  • xx brings clarity to communication when something is unclear
  • xx makes presentations with confidence and gets his/her message across clearly
  • xx expresses his/her opinions clearly
  • xx listens to others to gain understanding
  • xx clearly expresses his/her requirements and expectations of me
  • xx is open and honest in his/her communication

Individual values

Definition
Promotes dialog and understanding through communication.

Interpretation
A high score usually indicates that the leader encourages an open and safe work environment where knowledge-sharing and synergy thrive.

B
Very good
Score: 4.0
Spread: 0.0Gap to self: 0.9
Low - Your respondents agree on thisMedium - Your estimation deviates slightly from your respondents'

Decision-making

  • xx allocates resources optimally
  • xx is willing to modify his/her own decisions when appropriate
  • xx respects the decisions of others
  • xx considers alternative options
  • xx makes necessary decisions, even if they are unpopular
  • xx consults with relevant parties before making major decisions
  • xx clearly communicates his/her decisions to relevant parties
  • xx ensures that decisions are being executed

Individual values

Definition
Ability to make clear decisions based on a solid foundation and implement these decisions.

Interpretation
A high score usually indicates that employees rarely find themselves unsure about what is expected of them, and thus find it easier to perform their tasks.

C
Good
Score: 3.3
Spread: 0.4Gap to self: 0.3
Low - Your respondents agree on thisLow - Your estimation is close to your respondents'

Leadership

  • xx provides me with opportunities for growth and development
  • xx motivates me if I have an uninteresting task
  • xx provides me with tasks suitable to my professional level and experience
  • xx tells me if the quality of my work is unsatisfactory
  • xx continuously ensures that I know my goals
  • xx delegates tasks to the appropriate resources
  • xx allocates resources optimally
  • xx provides me with tasks, I find challenging
  • xx creates a motivating environment for goal-achievement
  • xx recruits talented employees
  • xx expresses his/her recognition when I do my work well

Individual values

Definition
Can guide, distribute work, and offer employees the opportunity to perform optimally.

Interpretation
A high score usually leads to enterprising, independent and high-performing employees.

C+
Good
Score: 3.4
Spread: 0.0Gap to self: 0.5
Low - Your respondents agree on thisLow - Your estimation is close to your respondents'

Social and networking

  • xx asks for help when it is needed
  • xx gets along well with most people
  • xx respects and maintains deadlines, and other agreements
  • xx is able to negotiate acceptable solutions for all parties involved
  • xx openly and honestly offers knowledge and skills to help others
  • xx relates well to all people, regardless of their position within the organization
  • xx promotes new ways of collaboration through his/her network
  • xx actively seeks new contacts
  • xx introduces people to one another
  • xx establishes useful networks within the organization
  • xx is credible

Individual values

Definition
Can obtain support/collaborative companionship through binding relationships and networks.

Interpretation
A high score indicates that the manager can easily create essential conditions to ensure flow and quality in work execution.

A-
Excellent
Score: 4.2
Spread: 0.3Gap to self: 0.9
Low - Your respondents agree on thisMedium - Your estimation deviates slightly from your respondents'

Teamwork

  • xx gets along well with most people
  • xx engages me in dialogue
  • xx is helpful
  • xx promotes new ways of collaboration through his/her network
  • xx supports others on the team
  • xx is credible
  • xx respects and maintains deadlines, and other agreements
  • xx listens to others to gain understanding
  • xx expresses respect for the opinions and views of others
  • xx understands and respects the role of other players on the team
  • xx knows and respects his/her role in team-based situations
  • xx brings valuable knowledge and skills to the team

Individual values

Definition
Can motivate employees/ team to achieve synergy through collaboration.

Interpretation
A high score usually indicates that the leader is able to create a stimulating work environment for high-performing employees.

B-
Very good
Score: 3.8
Spread: 0.6Gap to self: 1.0
Low - Your respondents agree on thisMedium - Your estimation deviates slightly from your respondents'

Open-response questions

Individual values

Text-based answers to open questions. The answers have been given with a promise of anonymity and it is not possible to see who have given the answer.

Areas of strength (1)

#Comments
1Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.

Areas of improvement (2)

#Comments
1Ut enim ad minim veniam.
2Ut enim ad minim veniam. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.

Benchmark comparison

Individual values

Key figures compared to previous surveys based on the same questions.


Benchmark example 1

Benchmark example 2

Standard 360
Stress management4.03.83.5
Communication3.94.14.0
Decision-making4.73.63.3
Leadership4.04.13.4
Social and networking4.24.14.2
Teamwork4.34.03.8
 

Question breakdown

Shows all numeric questions.

Breakdown by question (Agree 1-5)

5-point classic Likert scale

Individual values

Click the column headers to sort the table

#QuestionSelfManagerSubordinateSupplierAll
4xx motivates me if I have an uninteresting task4.03.03.03.03.2
5xx delegates tasks to the appropriate resources4.03.03.55.03.8
6xx makes necessary decisions, even if they are unpopular4.04.03.03.03.4
7xx recruits talented employees4.03.04.05.04.0
8xx uses his/her emotions constructively in difficult situations4.03.04.03.03.6
9xx understands and respects the role of other players on the team2.05.02.53.03.0
10xx provides me with tasks, I find challenging4.03.05.03.04.0
11xx makes presentations with confidence and gets his/her message across clearly5.04.04.05.04.4
12xx allocates resources optimally3.04.03.03.03.2
13xx promotes new ways of collaboration through his/her network4.05.04.54.04.4
14xx maintains a positive outlook at work4.05.03.04.03.8
15xx supports others on the team3.05.03.05.03.8
16xx expresses his/her opinions clearly3.04.04.54.04.0
17xx provides me with tasks suitable to my professional level and experience5.03.03.03.03.4
18xx considers alternative options3.04.03.03.03.2
19xx prioritizes assigned tasks under stress4.03.04.05.04.0
20xx reacts constructively to criticism4.03.03.03.03.2
21xx provides me with opportunities for growth and development4.05.02.53.03.4
22xx actively seeks new contacts5.04.04.54.04.4
23xx establishes useful networks within the organization3.05.04.05.04.2
24xx creates a motivating environment for goal-achievement4.03.03.52.03.2
25xx introduces people to one another4.04.04.04.04.0
26xx works productively in stressful environments3.03.03.05.03.4
27xx gets along well with most people5.05.04.05.04.6
28xx knows and respects his/her role in team-based situations2.05.04.53.03.8
29xx relates well to all people, regardless of their position within the organization3.05.04.04.04.0
30xx maintains his/her focus in stressed situations4.02.04.04.03.6
31xx is good at spotting new opportunities4.03.03.03.03.2
32xx expresses respect for the opinions and views of others3.05.04.03.03.8
33xx listens to others to gain understanding3.04.04.04.03.8
34xx is willing to modify his/her own decisions when appropriate5.04.03.03.03.6
35xx respects the decisions of others3.03.03.03.03.0
36xx consults with relevant parties before making major decisions4.04.03.03.03.4
37xx continuously ensures that I know my goals4.03.03.03.03.2
38xx tells me if the quality of my work is unsatisfactory4.03.03.03.03.2
39xx expresses his/her recognition when I do my work well3.04.02.53.03.0
40xx is helpful3.05.03.03.03.4
41xx clearly expresses his/her requirements and expectations of me3.04.04.54.04.0
42xx compromises when necessary3.04.04.54.04.0
43xx brings clarity to communication when something is unclear3.04.04.05.04.0
44xx is open and honest in his/her communication3.04.04.04.03.8
45xx clearly communicates his/her decisions to relevant parties3.04.03.03.03.2
46xx ensures that decisions are being executed3.04.03.03.03.2
47xx openly and honestly offers knowledge and skills to help others2.05.04.55.04.2
48xx asks for help when it is needed3.05.04.54.04.2
49xx is able to negotiate acceptable solutions for all parties involved3.05.04.04.04.0
50xx respects and maintains deadlines, and other agreements3.05.04.55.04.4
51xx is credible3.05.03.55.04.0
52xx brings valuable knowledge and skills to the team3.05.02.53.03.2

ScaleDescriptionValues
Agree 1-5
Continuous
5-point classic Likert scale5.0: Strongly agree
4.0: Agree
3.0: Neither agree nor disagree
2.0: Disagree
1.0: Strongly disagree

Breakdown by question (Male/Female)

Male or Female

Individual values

Click the column headers to sort the table

#QuestionSelfManagerSubordinateSupplierAll
1What is your gender?FemaleMale2 Male (100%)Male4 Male (80%)
1 Female (20%)

ScaleDescriptionValues
Male/Female
Discrete
Male or Female100.0: Male
0.0: Female

Breakdown by question (Age groups)

Age groups in steps of 5 years between 15 and 70

Individual values

Click the column headers to sort the table

#QuestionSelfManagerSubordinateSupplierAll
2What is your age?22.037.027.027.028.0

ScaleDescriptionValues
Age groups
Continuous
Age groups in steps of 5 years between 15 and 7017.0: 15-19
22.0: 20-24
27.0: 25-29
32.0: 30-34
37.0: 35-39
42.0: 40-44
47.0: 45-49
52.0: 50-55
57.0: 55-59
62.0: 60-64
67.0: 65-70

Breakdown by question (Month groups)

Months in groups ranging from less than 6 months to more than 6 years

Individual values

Click the column headers to sort the table

#QuestionSelfManagerSubordinateSupplierAll
3How long have you been employed at your current company?39111810
53How long have you known xx?18369315
54How long have you worked with xx?9314910

ScaleDescriptionValues
Month groups
Continuous
Months in groups ranging from less than 6 months to more than 6 years3: Less than 6 months
9: 6-12 months
18: 1-2 years
36: 2-4 years
60: 4-6 years
84: More than 6 years